阿霞 · 2006/05/05 · 1 則留言
(因為議題大,信件多,較難整理分類,就大家信件時間,收集紀錄) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 把此議題放在讀書會,讓更多專業的人來討論 來由----- 因尼泊爾的登山服務業現象,想來討論台灣的登山服務業與山中小屋事宜 歡迎專業登山者一起來關心台灣的山與愛山的人 阿霞 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 阿霞: > >> 真是傷腦筋,顯然是我要寫稿一事,影響了大家隨性發表的樂趣。若真是這樣,我的罪過就大了。 > >> > >> 其實,我本來完全沒有寫稿計畫的。因為這是我自己的假期,我自己付旅費。那十四天,我快快樂樂、糊里糊塗地玩,過程中故意不做任何記錄。 > >> > >> 但某一天晚上,徽正學長聊起台灣應該進口尼泊爾挑夫,因為原住民價碼太高,而且年輕的又不能背。我開口表示反對,主張我們該引進尼泊爾的專業挑夫制度,這或許可為原住民回到山中生存與找回尊嚴(獵人文化)的機會。那天與阿貴、芳民也聊到尼泊爾、日本、馬來西亞的山屋,認為有很多值得台灣效法與改進之處。 > >> > >> 回國的飛機上,徽正學長要我寫一篇文章,提倡這些觀念。我本來覺得這事情有點遠,需要從長計議,畢竟「商周」太商業取向。沒想到生活專刊同事(商周後面的部分)向我邀稿,我想,若藉此機會寫出我們的關心的問題也不錯,便初步答應了。 > >> > >> > >> 雅玲 ---------------------------------------- > > 對於山裡的一切比較 > > 我覺得是應該有文章來討論的 > > 每次出國,都覺得在台灣登山或欣賞山非常辛苦(也許年紀 故) > > 當然,如果在台灣登山如是輕鬆(一定會是很大眾化,也是擔心沒有道德的台灣人,會破壞大自然的) > > 這其間,真的是要有一些取捨。 > > > > 引進尼泊爾挑夫會比較便宜或好麼? > > ----他們對台灣地理環境熟麼? > > -----他們在異鄉賺錢,沒有賺的很夠划算麼? > > ------在尼泊爾本地,如果好好當個挑夫(或晉升為嚮導),生活在那裡應該還不錯(我曾問Mahke,他曾去過波卡拉多次,不是去當嚮導,而是去玩) > > ------尼泊爾山上人看來純樸,他們會像其他菲庸等,在台灣受到剝奪麼?(台灣對待外國幫傭的負面消息,已經讓外國很感冒)基本上,我是很擔心的 > > > > 我寧可讓純樸的人,留在純樸的大地上,這世界也會多個可愛的地方 > > > > > > 阿霞 --------------------------------------------------- 抱歉,寫得太快,我的意思是專業的「登山服務業」,包括嚮導與挑夫、廚師(有時要身兼數職),以及山屋的經營管理。阿霞的意見我非常贊同,也希望經驗與見識比我多多的大家多提供意見與資訊。 > > 雅玲 ------------------------------------------------- 如果能有專業的登山服務業制度出現 我想,在這經濟競爭的年代 不只是原住民搶著要做 可能連愛好登山的年輕人 都會入山當嚮導的(我看清純的研究生就是一個可以做多元化生意的人) 那麼 一個專業的登山服務業制度,應該是我們可以討論的議題 阿霞 --------------------------------------------- 各位好: 登山服務業 - 我也有話要說 - : 緣由: 去了尼泊爾回來,發現爬山可以不用那樣累,也可以不用那樣麻煩 常有人問起: 想去玉山(或其他山)從何著手? 阿貴名言: 只要是錢能辦的通的事都好辦。 目標: 登山服務業 - with single point of contact, provide 入山申請,交通,嚮導,挑夫,裝備,飲食,住宿。顧客只要出錢,其他都有人打理。 民宿走到高山 - 提供住宿,飯食,露營地,熱水澡。 實行: 其實我覺得只要是有市場,有關單位肯支持,而且是有利可圖,登山服務業應該不是難事。重賞之下必有勇夫。 看看雄獅旅遊這NT$4350玉山主峰2天2夜 - 免揹沉重的睡袋、公用食糧及烹飪器具,僅需攜帶著您個人的裝備即可出發。 每12位團員安排1位高山嚮導隨行照顧。 http://www.liontravel.com/erp/exhtml/06YUS3D002.asp 鼓吹一下,需求量大了,其他登山路線自然就會出場了。 肥水不落外人田,有沒有伙伴想出來創業專做登山旅遊或高山民宿? 我逛了些網站,發現太魯閣國家公園網站有些好文章,說明政府還是有(想)在做事的,有志者可一讀之 http://www.taroko.gov.tw/mp/tit1/2003.htm 那些在山上的日子 - 黃文卿 緊急避難與野外求生 - 賴明佑 安全實用的山屋及步道系統等登山設施 - 黃福森 國際現行山岳管理制度 - 李美涼 P.S. 嚮導職責: (copied from: Nepal Mountaineering Association - Functions and duties of the Sirdar/Guide) To assist the climbing party with recruitment of porters and other staff, control of porters, local purchase of food, etc. And to solve any problem that may arise to the best of his ability. To report to Nepal Mountaineering Association in case the party spends more than the prescribed time limit in the mountain. To ensure that the climbers comply with the terms of their permit. To ensure that the climbers (trekkers) follow the specified route. To ensure proper disposal of waste materials. To report to NMA any infringement of the climbing rules To report any serious incidents to the nearest police post. The Sirder Guide shall be employed from the day the climbing party begins the trek until the trek is finished. The Sirdar/Guide will be provided with the following 大少 ----------------------------------------------- 打中文不「輪轉」的大少,為此寫出這麼多意見,萬分感動。 我特別有興趣的是:尼泊爾嚮導職責。這份資料是哪裡找到的?還可以看到他們的training嗎? 雅玲 ---------------------------------------------- You are right, I have typed for hours and only few lines of Chinese came out from my fingers in my pervious e-mail. Very disappointed about myself. Here is some web sites that might interested you, I did not find the training detail yet, but will try again latter this week. Functions and duties of the Sirdar/Guide http://www.nepalmountaineering.org/climbingregulation.php Nepal's of Hotel management & Tourism Training Center (HMTTC) or called Nepal Academy of Tourism and Hotel Management (NATHM) http://www.tourism.gov.np/organizationundermoctca.htm http://highschoolchoice.mpls.k12.mn.us/Academy_of_Hospitality_and_Tourism.html Tourism policy http://www.nepalchamber.org/policy/tourism.html 大少 One guide training article from http://www.sherpatrek.com/pemas_stories/guide_training.php Guide Training In 1993 the Nepal Department of Tourism offerered a special course for hiking guides to qualify for official certification for the profession. Since the first class in 1985 the course was only offered roughly every 5 years and it was clear that Himalayan hiking was a very popular and lucrative tourist attraction. The number of guides who offered their services had boomed, but the government recognized that the level of experience and professional expertise was very inconsistent, so the courses and certification could give credibility. In 1993 almost 500 individuals registered for the class, and many of these applicants had cancelled their tour groups for the season to attend the course. However, there was really only space for 180 students, and the school made cuts by administering a pre-test over a few days involving interviews, indoor and outdoor evaluations. The top 180 were allowed to stay for the rest of the program and the rest were let go without a refund. Pema Dorje Sherpa placed #61 and was very happy to continue the class. There were many experienced Sherpas among the students, but there were others there as well. The class was given in the official Nepalese Hindi language and the training lasted over six weeks, with a few days outside learning rock climbing techniques. The classroom instruction covered some Nepalese history, background information on the National Park system, ways of relating well to clients and taking good care of special needs, trekking and expedition planning, locations and information about the best routes and camping areas, diagnosis and treatment of altitude sickness, operation of a Gamow bag, and conservation. The course helped to ensure that the certified guides would apply wisdom, common sense and professional integrity to be good stewards on behalf of Nepal. The class was led by a very experienced trekking guide and there really was no final exam. It wasn't necessary because the participants had proven themselves along the way, and it could be said the initial exam was their final exam. Now the certification is a great asset to a guide and clients do check for the badge. It is a real plus for those companies that maintain certified staff, and for Pema it has been much more valuable for him instead of taking an expedition during that season. ====== ====== One guide talked about his guide training: http://www.hikenepal.com/why_trek_with_me.html 1. What did you learn during your guide -training period? Fortunately, I had the chance to take training in two different places witha different way of teaching - one in Pokhara and the other in Kathmandu for a government issued guide license. Here are the basic parts of the training programs. (a) The theoretical course that provides the general information mainly about the topography, Cultural scenery, the history, zoology, first- aid training with broad information on how to recognize and treat altitude sickness, rescue and other associated topics. (b) After 3 months of theoretical program, the practical part involves 24 days that includes rock climbing as well as camping organization. 大少 -------------------------------------------------------- 台灣已經有此服務,1999我們去雪山,即是透過登山服務社 - 他們提供入山申請,交通,嚮導,挑夫,裝備,飲食,住宿。我們只揹自己私人用品,到山莊就是休息,唱歌,吃點心,欣賞風景,等吃晚飯,還有宵夜,墮落之極,我們曾介紹給幾年前的玉山隊,但是大家似乎喜歡自己揹,給自己一些挑戰。 Ray ---------------------------------------------------------- 是啊!這就是我們 "中年貴夫人" 嚮往的登山方式,只是每次都沒被 "採納",總被認為太 "匪類" >__ 我在山上過了一難忘的生日. > > 喜歡自己揹,其實不是為了給自己一些挑戰, > 而是不揹東西爬山,感覺不像"爬山", > 六年前我在尼泊爾山中健行也是接受全套服務, > 但那是因為該國制度規定那樣, > 在台灣,我個人目前還是傾向只有帳蓬等重物請挑伕揹, > 其餘還是喜歡自己來. > > 去年在藏地當背包客旅行二個月, > 除了感激山社當年給我的一些訓練, > 更重要的是自己這些年長期以來"堅持"的登山及旅行方式, > 我想小兒郎學長尤其能理解這些"堅持" > 這也是他今年六十高齡還讓大家羨慕的主因 > > 所以登山全服務,應看個人需要,並非所有人都適合 > > BB -------------------------------------- BB 講到重點 : 我在尼泊爾山中健行也是接受全套服務, 但那是因為該國制度規定那樣, 台灣為什麼沒有這種制度? 也還好沒有這種制度, 讓經濟能力差的學生可靠著自己的能力來親近山林, 不過,我記得以前有高山嚮導證的制度,要爬3000公尺 以上的大山得有高山嚮導隨行,現在已經取消,讓一些 靠高山嚮導證賺吃的一些山友不得不轉行,台南就有一個 叫 廚司登山隊的團體,上他們的網站可以看到下列這一段介紹: ****** ClimCook由一群喜愛爬山的山友所組成,自稱為廚司(cook).原本廚司們皆擁有高山嚮導資格(目前還是台南縣綠友登山協會幹部 與嚮導),但自民國92年元月起,攀登3000公尺級山岳都不需要高山嚮導隨行,故嚮導們改行當廚司;司機兼山徑帶領,賺點零用錢. ********** 如果有上過 [登山補給站] 的話,就知道其實這種專辦登山服務的團體不少,但我無緣去認識他們,因為家中一個現成山胞老是說那些團體都不及格不安全而且收費太貴.... 這個山胞幾個星期前才僱了一位原住民陪他去探勘無明山,一天收費3500, 但那個山胞沿途說他當挑夫以來,從沒走過這麼難走 的路,結果下山後,又給他寄了些錢過去。 以上一點點小心得。 雅真 -------------------------------------------------------------- 我要聲明一下,我並不反對古時候的登山方法(只要體力 OK),只是現在年邁體衰,卻仍嚮往高山風光,才會希望用點 "偷吃步",有了登山服務(當然要在一定的規範下服務),可以讓更 多人親近大自然,高山風光可以不再 "遙不可及",只是這樣一點小小心願而已。 尤其台灣擁有東北亞第一高峰---玉山,很多國人及觀光客都希望一親芳澤,可是反觀我們的排雲山莊,床位少,設備也夠陽春,即使現今已有部份的 "登山服務" 在進行中,和國外 (如:東馬 神山) 比 起來,總是相當的不方便,我想,只要能嚴格貫徹管理制度,把排雲山莊改進得 "稍微" 舒適一些,讓登山的人有一個較好的休息場所,也更能領略山川的美麗啊! 6:0 ------------------------------------------------ 如果將山屋(住宿,飲食)等硬體設施建置好之後, 那是不是例如登玉山,就會是由旅行社來辦就可以了? 所以可能不同的登山路線,所需要的服務不同,有點複雜。 同時,想想如果沒有良好的管制制度,那就會變得很可怕。 必須要國家公園可以提供適當的管理與限制,才不會導致太多人為的破壞。 不過我覺得上次聽璧玲說碰到香港的小學生(還是中學生)來爬雪山, 聽了蠻感慨的,登山服務如果健全一些, 至少會有更多的台灣的小孩(或錯過機會的退休大人也可以),會有更多的機會認識自己土地的美。 我覺得是值得推動的產業! 子珍